Auto Bailout Predictions

cash Over a year ago, I wrote a blog post about how the UAW was killing Detroit and how the government would ultimately bail them out.  The topic I addressed was UAW retirement money, not the big-three’s solvency, so it was a little different. But what is interesting to me is that back in Oct 2007, there were only 3 comments to my blog on the subject, one of which was my own!  However, since the bailout news struck this year, there have been 9 comments to this blog post.  Commentators so far have all agreed with the post; despite my dramatic writing style.  Since there is such interest in the subject, I did a little research on how that post relates to the latest bailout package for Detroit.

It turns out that my predictions were correct, but not for the right reasons.  The retirement trust fund (called a VEBA – Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association) started its establishment early this year.  By August, it was unclear if GM would have the financial capital to fund its portion of the fund.  And by December, of course, the VEBA is part of the reason GM is seeking handouts from Washington.  My prediction of a bailout was right, although the cause was wrong.  I blamed the UAW for mismanagement of funds, whereas it turned out that GM just didn’t have the cash to even get started.  I still stand by my claim that the UAW will mismanage the money.  I’m not the only one who didn’t understand how the UAW would agree to take on a $51B liability with only $30B in funding from GM.  Unless you’re anxious to skim off the top, it doesn’t make sense.

Serious Security Flaw in IE

From Yahoo Tech:

The major press outlets are abuzz this morning with news of a major new security flaw that affects all versions of Internet Explorer from IE5 to the latest beta of IE8….

Virtually all security experts (as well as myself) are counseling users to switch to any other web browser — none of the others are affected, including Firefox, Chrome, and Opera — at least for the time being, though Microsoft has stubbornly said it "cannot recommend people switch due to this one flaw." Microsoft adds that it is working on a fix but has offered no ETA on when that might happen. Meanwhile it offers some suggestions for a temporary patch, including setting your Internet security zone settings to "high" and offering some complicated workarounds. (Some reports state, however, that the fixes do not actually work.)

Google Chrome Released

google Google Chrome shipped today!  If you didn’t try Chrome because it was in beta, you can now download a finished and supported product.

Some people associate Google with never-ending betas.  GMail, for instance, is still in beta.  Remaining in beta was never the intention for Chrome; we always had a simple goal to take Chrome out of beta as soon as it we had data to prove that it contains enough features, stability, and performance that real users would be happy with it as a primary browser.  We hope we’re at that point.

Our goal is to move quickly with new features and fixes for Chrome.  More needs to be done and more is coming.  If you’ve got comments or suggestions, be sure to let us know.

PS:  I do not speak officially for my employer.

Vista Without Dual Core

slow2 I’ve been a pretty big fan of Vista so far at home.  This week I installed Vista on a machine at work.  While the machine is a slightly older one, its no slouch – its a 2.66GHz Hyperthreaded P4 with 3GB of RAM.  But the machine is as slow as a dog running Vista.  I had no trouble with XP on this system, but Vista is janky; it frequently lags and stalls doing basic operations.

All in all, it makes me think the class action lawsuit against Microsoft may have some merit.  It certainly makes me think Microsoft’s claim of minimum Vista requirements is a joke.

If upgrading to Vista, make sure you’ve got a dual core system.  I’d bet that the vast majority of developers at Microsoft run exclusively on dual core (or better) machines.  [We developers at Google probably do too, but at least I’m still using this one :-)]

A Video Site Worth Using!

I never really understood YouTube.  It’s neat, I guess.  But frankly, its mostly junk, and I hardly ever use it (I don’t even have a YouTube account).  However, over the last week I’ve really started to notice Hulu, a completely different approach to online video.  Unlike YouTube, Hulu could be the Comcast of the future.

Hulu does not have any home made videos (which are usually low quality).  Rather, they license high-quality movie and television content that you’d actually want to watch.  Maybe it’s because I don’t have cable at home, or maybe its because the video is actually really good quality – but this is a service I like.  I watched the movie “Spy Games” with Robert Redford & Brad Pitt the other night, and it was great.

Advantages of Hulu:
* High-quality video.
* Content that you’ll recognize and want to watch.
* They do include advertisements during the video, but they’re usually 15-30s, and quite minor compared to cable television.
* They even offer some custom content only found on Hulu such as Crawford and Dr. Horrible.

Disadvantages of Hulu:
* Limited selection of content.  (But improving all the time!)
* You are required to login to view much of the content.  (Not too bad though)

$700,000,000,000

President Bush asked for a little money today.  Here are some ways to put that into perspective.  I use the very handy data from the census bureau for these calculations.

  • He recommends spending ~$2300 for every person in the United States.
  • According to the census, there are about 33 million Americans earning less than $50K per year with mortgages.  Assuming a 10% default rate (this is huge) and an average $92,000 mortgage, we could cover all defaulted loans for $303Billion.
  • There are 6,450,000 Americans living below the poverty and holding mortgages.  Their median mortgage (sorry, I don’t have the average) is $21,390.  We could roughly pay off all of these people’s homes for only $137Billion.

The Killer Vista Feature

startmenu At home I use Vista.  At work I use mostly XP.  There is really only one feature I miss from Vista when I’m at work.

Search in the start menu.  I can’t stand XP’s menus on the start button.  I’ve got at least 4 machines, each with different ways of categorizing things in the start menu.  They all are way too cluttered to spot anything, and I loathe every time I have to go these menus.  With Vista, all you do is search.  Type “e”, and you are already at Excel.  Type “programs” and you’re in the control panel.  It’s just great.

I realize you can buy add-on products to XP to do this.  Maybe I will.  This is the most visible feature that I miss from Vista.